AVMA backs sow stalls, stresses welfare initiatives
Aug 01, 2005
SCHAUMBURG, ILL. — The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) votes to support sow gestation stalls until a more welfare-friendly housing system that's reliable, efficient and economically viable is conceived.
The long-awaited position praised by allied veterinary groups and condemned by animal activists lends two pages of scientific review to an assessment of sow stalls' relationship to animal welfare. The answer isn't clearcut, say authors of AVMA Task Force on the Housing of Pregnant Sows. Used properly, sow stalls can "minimize aggression and injury, reduce competition, allow individual feeding and assist in control of body condition." But they also restrict movement, exercise, foraging and social interaction, the position statement says.
While the new position is far from radical, the mere mention of sow stalls incites controversy with activists opposing the tight confines and industry experts touting the system's redeeming welfare values. According to AVMA, U.S. housing systems for pregnant sows are divided into two main types: group and individual, each with its own advantages and drawbacks.
"The AVMA recognizes that veterinarians approach the issue of pregnant sow housing from different viewpoints based on personal and societal values," the statement says. "Some veterinarians are opposed in principal to the close confinement of animals, some are opposed in principle to the use of animal for food and some work with the swine industry to maintain animal health and productivity."
The position statement AVMA previously acknowledged sow stalls as being welfare acceptable, and according to the new report, not much other than an outline of welfare assessments has changed.
What the document makes clear is that task-force members reviewed sow gestation stalls as related to the physiology, behavior, production and health of the animals housed. A review of the literature studied provides the following welfare assessments:
Outside reaction The statement fails to explain "different" behaviors exhibited by crated sow or clarify whether the terms "not different" production performance really means "identical." Nevertheless, Dr. Tom Burkgren is pleased. As executive director of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians, he praises the task force for using science to "remove the rhetoric and politics" associated with sow stalls.
"I think the report is consistent with what we've been saying to AVMA for years," he says. "They did an excellent job, really boiling it down to what we think is a very good position statement."