Steroids can offer relief for skin conditions, but use cautiously - DVM
  • SEARCH:
News Center
DVM Featuring Information from:

ADVERTISEMENT

Steroids can offer relief for skin conditions, but use cautiously


DVM Best Practices



This Golden Retriever shows ventral areas of erythema with secondary hyperpigmentation and alopecia.
Glucocorticoids are useful drugs. Their utilization has allowed for control of many diseases and conditions that otherwise would likely result in death or the ultimate euthanasia of many dogs and cats. Diseases of altered immune responses are the prime benefactors of their efficacy. In the world of veterinary dermatology, diseases such as pemphigus foliaceus, lupus erythematosus, bullous pemphigoid and a host of others can often be successfully managed and long-term remission can be achieved with their usage. There are alternatives for therapy to these diseases however many alternative drug regimens or procedures to treat autoimmune diseases are costly, in the case of azathioprine, chlorambucil, cyclosporine and others, or not widely available, in the case of procedures such as plasmapharesis. Thus glucocorticoids have become the workhorse of drug therapy in managing these diseases or allowing for reduced dosages of other more potent drugs. In addition to their myriad of uses there are also many potential side effects and complications that may arise from their usage and appropriate monitoring is important. Despite their use in these diseases, the most common diseases with cutaneous manifestations that are treated with steroids are allergic skin disease.

Treatment application The usefulness of glucocorticoids in helping to manage allergic skin disease, specifically atopy, is unquestioned, while their ability to control other allergic skin diseases (food allergy, flea allergy and contact allergy) is more controversial. However, owing to their undesirable side effects, the use and, in some cases, misuse may result in additional problems. In addition, there are many alternatives that exist for dealing with an allergic patient. Many of these can be safe and relatively inexpensive, so steroids may be best reserved for those patients that are nonresponsive to an exhaustive search for other control methods.

This is a common problem seen at the author's practice that at least a portion of dogs that are presented as chronic allergic dogs for intradermal skin testing, are in fact, noncontrolled bacterial or Malassezia pyodermas that have not been resolved effectively. The inability to resolve the pyoderma often results from the lack of administration of appropriate antibiotics for an appropriate length of time or due to the immunesuppressive effects of steroids leaving the body unable to resolve the pyoderma by its own immune response or both.

One of the most important pieces of advice that dermatologists can give to the general practitioner regarding glucocorticoid usage is to adhere to a well regimented and step wise workup of all pruritic dogs to eliminate these other pruritic diseases. This will allow the practitioner to be much more successful in managing pruritic patients in particular and dermatological patients in general. Pruritus in the absence of bacterial or Malassezia pyoderma, parasitic infestation (Sarcoptes, cheyletiella or fleas), lack of response to appropriate food trials as well as lack of response to various antihistamines, fatty acids and topical therapies may be an indication for glucocorticoids, however using glucocorticoids for the clinical signs of pruritus without addressing these other issues will often lead to chronic frustration for veterinarian and owner alike.

After a diagnosis of atopy has been made, either by intradermal skin test or by exclusion of other pruritic diseases, and a decision has been made to use glucocorticoids, the practitioner must select the appropriate steroid and route of administration. Various routes of administration include topical, oral, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous or intralesional depending on individual disease and drug used. There are numerous synthetic glucocorticoids available for use in the United States and in general, these are more potent in regard to their glucocorticoid activity than naturally produced cortisol. Synthetic glucocorticoids also have a higher affinity for the steroid receptor, slower degradation and a longer duration of action.


Ventral aspect of paw with intense erythema from atopic dermatitis.
Potency Glucocorticoids are divided into three groups based on potency. Their potency is assessed relative to hydrocortisone which has an arbitrary rating of 1.0. They are divided into short acting, consisting of cortisone (.8), and hydrocortisone (1.0); intermediate acting, consisting of prednisone (4.0), methylprednisolone (5.0) and triamcinolone (5.0); and long acting, consisting of paramethasone (10.0), flumethasone (15.0), dexamethasone (30.0) and betamethasone (35.0).

Duration of action for injectable glucocorticoids is influenced by the form of the glucocorticoid in the preparation. Since synthetic glucocorticoids are synthesized as esters, the less soluble the ester, the slower the rate of absorption. For example, highly soluble esters include products such as Solu-Delta Cortef (Pharmacia/Upjohn) and Azium SP® (Schering-Plough). Moderately insoluble esters include products such as Depo-Medrol® (Pharmacia/Upjohn) while poorly soluble esters include Vetalog (Solvay).


ADVERTISEMENT


Click here