A voided urine sample was obtained from a 12-year old spayed female Dachshund as part of an annual evaluation of health status.
According to the owners, the dog was in good health. The dog had a history of aerobic bacterial lower urinary tract infections
on three occasions during the past five years. The three episodes of lower UTI were caused by three different species of bacteria
and were eradicated by appropriate antimicrobial therapy. An underlying cause for the recurrent lower UTI could not be found.
The most recent episode of UTI occurred one year previously. Urinalysis of a voided sample collected by the owner revealed:
specific gravity = 1.025; pH = 7.5; protein = 1+; leukocyte esterase test for white cells = negative; RBC in sediment = 0
to 1 per highpower field; white cells in sediment = 1 to 3 per high-power field. No other abnormalities were detected. Results
of a CBC and serum chemistry profile were also normal. Is this magnitude of pyuria of clinical significance in this dog? What
is the basis for your answer? Are additional diagnostic tests or treatment warranted?
Points to consider:
Leukocyte test pads: Leukocyte test pads frequently give false-negative test results in dogs, even when pyuria is present.
Although the test is specific for white cells in dogs, it is very insensitive. In contrast, leukocyte test pads give false-positive
test results in most cats in absence of pyuria, and therefore are of no value in this species. Therefore, it is important
to evaluate fresh urine sediment to determine the presence or absence of pyuria in dogs and cats.
Urine sediment: Using standardized technique, urine sediment should be evaluated for white cells. Significant numbers of white cells (which
may be associated with RBC and protein) in a properly collected sample suggest an inflammatory lesion of the urinary tract.
The inflammatory lesion may or may not be associated with infectious agents. The question related to our Dachshund is, "What
number of white cells is significant?"
Significant pyuria: Although the normal range of white cells (neutrophils) in urine sediment prepared from a 5 milliliter aliquot of urine has
been reported to be 0 to 3 white cells per high-power field (450X) in samples collected by cystocentesis, and 0 to 8 white
cells per high-power field in catheterized or midstream voided samples, several variables that influence white cell numbers
should be considered (Table 1). In this context, it becomes readily apparent that there is no absolute cut off point between
upper numbers of "normal" white cell numbers and lower limits of "abnormal" white cell numbers.
Additional diagnostic points:
1) Detection of a significant number of bacteria in association with pyuria indicates that the inflammatory lesion is active,
and has been caused or complicated by bacterial infection. However, since bacteria are more difficult to detect than white
cells, pyuria may appear to be unassociated with low numbers of bacteria (Table 2). Therefore, urine obtained from patients
with significant pyuria should be cultured routinely for bacteria.
2) A positive urine culture in the absence of pyuria should arouse suspicion that the bacteria are contaminants. However,
bacterial UTI can occur without detectable concomitant pyuria in patients given glucocorticoids, those with hyperadrenocorticism
and those who are immunosuppressed. Therefore, absence of pyuria should not be interpreted as unequivocal proof that bacterial
UTI can be excluded.
3) Sometimes urine sediment appears to contain bacteria, yet urine cultures are sterile. There are several possible explanations
for this phenomenon (Table 3).