VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA — Teetering on financial ruin, the British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association (BCVMA) faces
roughly 50 lawsuits carrying millions of dollars in punitive damages if veterinarians from India prove Canadian regulators
guilty of discrimination.
Insiders predict the legal whirlwind might soon blow into the United States.
The plaintiffs, who bill themselves as British Columbia Veterinarians for Justice, accuse BCVMA of unfairly restricting and
challenging their licenses based on race.
A court-issued gag order barred the association from commenting despite repeated DVM Newsmagazine requests. The charges, filed by 19 veterinarians in British Columbia Superior Court and an estimated 30 veterinarians in The British
Columbia Human Rights Tribunal, revolve around a long list of discrimination allegations. According to court documents, the
accusers insist BCVMA, a membership body that doubles as the province's regulatory agency, unfairly singles out Indian-born
veterinarians by demanding they pass an English-language proficiency test to practice in the country — the same test issued
to foreign practitioners in the United States. The plaintiffs allege BCVMA abuses its power, defames and maliciously prosecutes
foreign veterinarians by conducting hearings for unwarranted regulatory violations that tarnish their reputations. Such targeting,
they say, is a conspiracy to stifle Indo-Canadian veterinarians whose service charges fall below the association's published
fee guide.
Federal Trade Commission laws prohibit U.S. veterinary groups from circulating pricing averages in a fee guide format. But
in Canada, the ability to publish fee guides gives organized veterinary medicine motive to shut down immigrant practitioners
who charge less for services, contends plaintiffs' attorney Gerhard Pyper, scheduled at presstime to represent the superior
court plaintiffs in mediation proceedings with BCVMA.
"This is basically a capitalistic problem," he says. "Immigrants are willing to work longer hours at cheaper rates. That threatens
established business. You can imagine that people don't like that. My clients feel a threat to their opportunity."
Pyper claims to already have a prospective veterinarian client in New Jersey armed with similar discrimination grievances.
"This is something that's also reflected in the United States. Given the country's more established Constitution and protection
of human rights, I think it will be easier to win cases there."
Facing claims?
No U.S. regulatory body contacted by DVM Newsmagazine at presstime reported any lawsuits charging discrimination grievances. Still, Pyper insists they're on the horizon.
Veterinarians for Justice, he says, have been fighting BCVMA for three years. As Supreme Court mediation begins, the human
rights tribunal cases will follow with hearings in March.
BCVMA officials, citing the gag order, refused to publicly address any of the cases, but in a December letter to members,
leaders outlined the group's dire situation. The lawsuits filed in both venues seek punitive damages that, if assessed, could
cost BCVMA millions of dollars. Due to an insurance policy that calls for $50,000 deductibles, fighting the lawsuits and any
punitive damages issued might force BCVMA to shut down and its leaders to resign. The government would then pick up licensure
oversight, officials say.
"It's cheaper to mediate these things," Pyper says. "The court system takes a long time. Everybody just wants to move on.
My clients just want to be treated fairly."
From the sidelines
Like BCVMA officials, Pyper's clients did not respond to DVM Newsmagazine's interview requests. The list of grievances within collected Supreme Court documents are long and the human rights tribunal
staff insists their case is 4 inches thick.
Jost am Rhyn, executive director of the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association, says he's concerned similar charges might
spread. Seven out of 10 Canadian provinces are set up with membership bodies that double as regulators, unlike the U.S. system
that separates licensing entities from state and national associations. The Canadian VMA, a self-interest group with no legal
ties to BCVMA, is closely monitoring the case for its 6,300 members.