DeHaven takes on walking horse industry over soring on behalf of AVMA, AAEP - DVM
  • SEARCH:
News Center
DVM Featuring Information from:

ADVERTISEMENT

DeHaven takes on walking horse industry over soring on behalf of AVMA, AAEP
American Veterinary Medical Association executive vice president testifies at congressional hearing for house bill.


DVM360 MAGAZINE


Compliance

According to Phil Osborne with Kentucky-based public relations firm Preston-Osborne, which is now representing the Performance Show Horse Association, the walking horse industry horse inspection organizations (HIOs) have found more than 98 percent of entries in 2013 to be compliant with the HPA in regards to soring violations. HIOs are industry groups that have been approved by the USDA to self-police competitions and the industry.

DeHaven likens the HIO system to the fox watching the hen house: "[A current HIO inspector is] five to 10 times more likely to identify a violation when he has a USDA inspector over his shoulder."

Osborne says DeHaven is quoting out-of-date statistics. "Not only is his accusation false and misleading, the truth shows something that is completely opposite," Osborne says. "The goal is to eliminate soring altogether; however, a compliance rate of between 96.6 and 98 percent would prove that current levels of soring are indicative of a very small faction of the walking horse industry."

However, Osborne says the compliance rate the industry touts includes all exhibition entries—not just big lick horses, but all Tennessee walking horses, both pleasure and padded. "When they talk about compliance rates that's taking all the flat shod with the big lick horses," DeHaven says. "If you just looked at the big lick horses the prevalence of soring—I think—would be very high."

U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) Public Affairs Specialist Tanya Espinosa says as of Nov. 3, the USDA attended unannounced 63 of 288 horse events. At those events, 1,198 entries were scratched prior to inspection—896 of those pulled from competition were horses wearing pads and action devices. Of the 9,510 entries at USDA-attended shows, 399 individual horses were found in violation of the HPA—325 of them were found on horses wearing pads and action devices.

USDA has no way of knowing why a horse owner pulls an entry prior to inspection, but about 75 percent of those scratched at an event with unannounced USDA attendance were wearing pads and action devices. And while only 4 percent of all horses exhibited were found to be sore, 81 percent of sore horses were wearing pads and action devices.

Osborne says the USDA has an advantage to detect soring because its inspectors have access to thermography, x-ray, swabbing and blood testing, but DeHaven simply feels there is an inherent conflict of interest among HIOs and their Designated Qualified Persons (DQPs) who inspect show horses.

DeHaven says an essential part of the PAST Act is establishing a new inspection program where independent individuals—most likely veterinarians—would be licensed, trained and overseen by USDA. HIOs and DQPs would be a thing of the past. "Hopefully inspectors would all be veterinarians," DeHaven says. Even if they aren't veterinarians, but trained by USDA, "They would be far more independent and objective in doing the inspections."

Currently Heart of America, PRIDE and SHOW HIOs are in the process of decertification by USDA for noncompliance. The Walking Horse Trainers Association and the Performance Show Horse Association (PSHA) support dissolving all HIOs in favor of one industry HIO. "The USDA has proven, when the HPA was first made law, that it is incapable of regulating the industry without help from self-regulatory measures," Osborne says.

DeHaven agrees that with USDA's limited budget, it cannot inspect all shows alone. "This act would not really get USDA at more shows, but ensure that the inspectors that went would be truly independent," DeHaven says.

Proponents of the PAST Act say the bill would stop what they believe is a culture of soring. DeHaven says there is no acceptable amount of soring and those that do sore are hurting the entire walking horse breed. "We really have within the walking horse breed a subpopulation, which is the big lick horses; that is probably 10 percent or less of the walking horse population, but the whole breed is getting a negative cast on it."


ADVERTISEMENT

Source: DVM360 MAGAZINE,
Click here