Minorities reject profession, research shows
Of the nation's 9,363 veterinary students, less than 10 percent claims nonwhite status, AAVMC reports
Feb 01, 2003
Manhattan, Kan.-When senior Roz Pineda runs her equine rotations, she's usually the only minority in the room.
The future DVM of Asian-Hispanic descent joins 12 other minority students attending Kansas State University's (KSU) veterinary college. Roughly 400 students are enrolled. One is black.
"My father is a surgeon, my brother is internist, so the notable profession in my family was being a doctor in human medicine.
"Veterinary medicine was not something I was guided toward. In our household, animals were viewed as dirty," she adds.
Numerous references cited in Elmore's work suggests veterinary medicine has not turned its back on minorities despite AAVMC's report revealing 91 percent of DVMs are Caucasian.
Instead, Elmore theorizes that minorities are indifferent toward the field. To change the profession's make-up, animal ownership must be encouraged, he says.
Ethnic attitudes toward pets While there's little survey information documenting animal ownership by race or ethic group, Elmore's report suggests whites own pets at a much higher rate then most minorities. Data recently published in American Demographics shows whites are 10 percent more likely to own a pet than the average American, whereas blacks are 57 percent, Asians are 28 percent and Hispanics are 20 percent less likely to own a pet.
As a result, students interested in health profession careers and have little animal contact are less likely to choose veterinary medicine, Elmore theorizes. To change the face of the profession, animal ownership by all races must be encouraged, the report adds.
"Many minority students who have never previously interacted with animals have chosen human medicine," Elmore writes. "Given the lack of substantial experience with animals and the more than double expected average annual income in human medicine, this is not surprising."
But as Elmore cites some of her recently published work in his report, Brown says the author's plan to diversify the profession by promoting animal ownership is idealistic considering the minority poverty levels. According to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2000 report, the 1999 poverty rate for Hispanics was 22.8 percent and 23.6 percent for blacks. By contrast, the poverty rate for non-Hispanic whites ranked 7.7 percent.
"Pets cost money, and to say animal ownership should be promoted when your income is $27,000 a year may be unrealistic," Brown says. "You can't encourage a poor family to take in a pet when it'll be another burden and also might limit their housing options."
"I think just promoting pet care without addressing this bigger sociologic issue is wrong."
Brown is "dead on," says Dr. Michael Blackwell, dean of the University of Tennessee's veterinary college and one of Tuskegee University's early black DVM graduates.
"What it does comes down to is pet ownership, but that's closely tied to economics and other factors," he says. "Changing the demographics of veterinary medicine largely depends whether other sociological factors change."
Missed business potential In the meantime, Elmore and Brown are calling on the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and other groups to address the diversity issue. Failure to reach minorities amounts to lost business potential, they say.
"I called the AVMA and asked how many black veterinarians were in the United States, and I got a 'I don't know,'" Elmore says. "If the AVMA doesn't know, then who does? From a marketing standpoint, our profession is really missing the boat if we don't look at this seriously."
The profession's missing a huge marketing opportunity, too, Elmore adds.
"There's a huge population that currently doesn't own animals," he says. "This shouldn't be about the money, but if it will get the attention of our profession, maybe we can change things."