Pain management: The positive effects on your practice and patients

Pain management: The positive effects on your practice and patients

Adopting a pain management culture can benefit all stakeholders involved in patient care
Feb 01, 2011

While many perceived obstacles to implementing a comprehensive and integrated pain management system exist in a veterinary practice,1 expense or lack of profitability should not be among them. Indeed, pain management provides one of those rare convergences of benefit for the pet, reward to the veterinarian and staff, satisfaction for the client and boost to the economic health of the practice.

More pain management resources
Pain management strengthens veterinary practices directly through a fee-for-service construct, but it can lend several other, less-obvious economic advantages. Chief among these is the enhancement of job satisfaction. Team members are often highly intuitive about their patients' comfort and will score them as more painful compared with veterinarians' assessments.2 Team members can also be more aware than veterinarians of clients' distress about their pets' discomfort. Team members who subsequently struggle with the ethics and patient-care consequences of a poorly conceived or implemented pain management system can leave a practice prematurely, requiring replacement and, in turn, potentially causing a significant economic penalty to the practice.

Pet owners are generally very sensitive to the comfort and abilities of their pets. Practices that enjoy and promote a culture emphasizing pain control are apt to increase client satisfaction, as well as referrals of like-minded pet owners—the A+ clients we all desire and actively seek.

Finally, there's direct remuneration for providing pain management services. The client fee may be calculated based on the cost of goods but also should be commensurate to the value to the patient, which is often high.

Improving both patient care and a practice's vitality

The profit margin on most pain management drugs is often quite satisfactory (although arguably the least profitable among them are the highly effective and commonly used NSAIDs). Whenever a special technique (vs. a simple injection or oral prescription) is required for delivery, fees should reflect the additional supplies and, most important, the expertise required to use them. Such special techniques include epidurals, constant-rate infusions (CRIs), local or regional nerve blocks and infusion catheters.

The prospects of simultaneously improving both patient care and practice economic health are almost boundless. For example, there are pain management opportunities for even the most common, seemingly mundane procedures such as gaining vascular access. Properly applying a commercial topical lidocaine-prilocaine product on the shaved skin over the vein of choice can save the patient the discomfort of indwelling intravenous catheterization while minimizing the anxiety associated with restraint to accomplish the task (anxiety itself has been demonstrated to enhance pain3). The ease of catheter placement diminishes not only the patient's stress but also stress on team members performing and assisting with the procedure. In properly premedicated patients with preapplication of topical lidocaine-prilocaine, it becomes possible for one skilled technician to place their intravenous catheters, without an assistant to restrain the patients. Charging even a small fee for this substantial patient and staff benefit, when repeated hundreds, if not thousands of times a year, will bring income to the practice commensurate to the value to the patient.

The same construct applies with the routine use of local and regional blockade to surgical incisions and major wound repair. Mastery of the tool's many applications is within the ability of any primary care clinician. Examples include simple line or paraincisional blocks; intratesticular, intra-articular, intercostal, pleural, peritoneal and epidural blocks and diffusion catheter application. The cost of materials, lidocaine and bupivacaine is minimal, yet locoregional anesthesia demonstrably lowers postoperative pain scores and simultaneously minimizes the quantities of required systemic analgesic medications, limiting the potential for adverse effects. The value to the patient can be unmistakable, as can the benefits to the practice.