Treating deep-seated brain tumors in dogs
Supporting surgical excisions for deep-seated glial tumors
Mar 01, 2011
The arsenal of treatments available for patients with deep-seated glial tumors continues to grow every year. And that's good news. One treatment to consider recommending to clients involves wide excision of these neoplasms.
When treating human patients with these types of tumors, neurosurgons struggle with critical considerations such as significant sensory or motor deficits that may result from the surgical procedure. For dogs, these long-term complications are less likely. It is important to keep in mind that a dog's brain differs significantly from that of people, and the alternative to more aggressive treatment is likely an early death either from the effects of the tumor itself or as a result of euthanasia.
The considerations highlighted here involve ablation of deep-seated glial tumors. Since the surgical rules for removing the most common neoplasm, the prefrontal meningioma, are less complicated, this discussion focuses on deep-brain neoplasms.Differences between human and canine brain
If one believes the case for a designated and genetically well-defined language portion of the human brain, as eloquently outlined by Steven Pinker in the book Language Instinct, then one recognizes that the human brain needed to develop in a new way for everything to physically fit. We humans have exquisite and unique right and left brain anatomy. These assignments, with notable exceptions, develop early in life and commit brain areas to specific functions in an irreversible manner.
Sally Springer, in her book Left Brain, Right Brain, describes what we know about this lateralization. She writes about various experiments, including those involving primates and human stroke and surgical patients. Springer states that in subprimates the distinction between brain hemisphere function doesn't seem to exist; indeed, information is gathered and shared by both hemispheres. It makes sense that in order for language to fit into the already crowded and massively developing human brain, compromises might have to be made. While this is conjecture, it does lead to the first of two premises supporting surgical excision of the deep-seated glioma.
First, most of the literature states that these deep-seated tumors in dogs are inoperable. That determination is likely based on a lack of experience and concerns faced by our human neurosurgeon colleagues. Experimental ablation studies going back more than 100 years demonstrate that dogs are much less dependent on cortical function for daily activities. In my experience, the hemiparesis that occurs with large telencephalon ablation in surgical cases resolves dramatically within four to eight weeks after surgery. This dramatic resolution of signs is most likely the result of neural plasticity, where other portions of the brain (perhaps the remaining normal hemisphere) take over. This kind of recovery is known to be limited in humans. The first premise, then, is that dogs can regain an adequate amount of normal function after recovering from a significant surgical lesion to a single brain hemisphere. A large volume of older literature supports this.
The second premise encouraging us to consider surgical ablation of deep-seated glial tumors is that they rarely metastasize. These neoplasms almost always present as solitary, though large masses within the calvarium. Since metastasis is uncommon, a wide excision has the potential to be curative, even if the histopathologic description is "highly malignant." In fact, it can be surmised that the neoplasms are large at presentation because dogs can tolerate severe compressive and invasive damage before clinical signs become apparent. Therefore, since these neoplasms tend to be solitary and don't metastasize, a wide excision has the potential to be curative.