USDA ruling may call DVMs to action in BSE surveillance
Washington-In the wake of the country's first case of mad cow disease, the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) ruling to ban all non-ambulatory, disabled livestock from being slaughtered may mean that the government will rely on veterinarians and producers to get access to test animals at highest risk for mad cow disease.
The first U.S. case was detected in December.
DeHaven explains, "Now that those animals, or the preponderance of nonambulatory animals-will not be going to slaughter, our efforts right now are focused on modifying our surveillance systems so that we still have access to that population of animals."
DeHaven adds, "Clearly we think that nonambulatory animals, particularly the older nonambulatory animals, are the population at highest risk and therefore the group that we want to continue to focus our surveillance on.
The message is, USDA does not want to curtail testing, so they will need access to this group of animals deemed of highest risk for having BSE through rendering plants or those animals on the farm.
DeHaven explains, "We think the most likely route there is is working through the American Veterinary Medical Association and the local practitioner who has established that relationship with the dairy farmer. So, we will be refocusing our effort to have access to those same animals, but before they would be going to slaughter. "
Secretary of Agriculture Ann M. Veneman made the decision in late December after the National Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory confirmed the positive BSE case, which originated in Canada.
Surveillance efforts Dr. Lisa Ferguson, senior staff veterinarian with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), adds that both producers and private practitioners have always been a part of USDA's surveillance, just by reporting odd clinical signs.
"If an animal was acting weird, we would do a foreign animal disease investigation. That has always been part of our surveillance," Ferguson adds.
"A significant portion of our surveillance has been obtained from non-ambulatory animals. Not only is that a high-risk population, to a certain extent, it was easy and efficient (to gather samples)."
While Ferguson did not have the exact breakdown in numbers of non-ambulatory samples collected, she adds, "Our assumption is that a large portion of them are in the slaughter for human consumption chain."
With USDA's policy change prohibiting downers from entering the human food chain, she adds that officials are working with industries and various groups to try to ensure access to those animals at highest risk.
"We are also working with producer and practitioner groups to build on what we have done in the past and continue those efforts," she explains. "We are kicking around lots of different options and looking at different things we can do. We have not finalized any plans just yet, but that will be coming up in the near future."
Ferguson says that communication will not include regulatory changes and will be communicated through practitioner/industry groups.
She adds that if veterinarians have questions, they should contact their APHIS area veterinarian in their state.
However, veterinarians report the consumer confidence in the safety of the nation's food supply is of utmost importance. In other words, it's the cost of doing business.
Dr. Bob Smith, a feedlot consultant and chair of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association's (NCBA) Animal Health and Well-being Committee, says that there needs to be a clear distinction between sick and injured animals entering the food chain. "Sometimes that distinction gets blurred with the media."
Smith explains that sick animals should never be allowed in the food chain, but injured animals following an antemortem and postmortem inspection pose little risk to consumers.
"If an animal had a fracture or some other acute injury, and they were bright and alert and passed both the antemortem and postmortem inspection they allowed that. There is very little risk to the food supply from animals harvested under those conditions."